NAS with the ability to connect 4 hard drives with an Atom processor. You are unlikely to find cheaper than 20,000 rubles.
But they have flaws:ġ) They are expensive. Why not a hardware NAS?It would seem that manufacturers have long taken care of the users, and have long produced ready-made boxes specifically for home use. Well, it’s advisable to administer all this through the web interface. And for the convenience of downloading, we need a torrent client. To access media data from smart TVs, we need a DLNA server. Of course, everyone has their own needs, so if you use MacOS or Linux, then you will probably need other protocols (NFS, AFP), but I will describe the configuration in the way I did for myself. To access the data you need to configure FTP and Samba access.
#BEST UPNP SERVER FOR UBUNTU ARCHIVE#
First of all, RAID is required for reliability, because losing the entire home media archive due to a failed hard drive is at least stupid. What do we need?First of all, NAS requires, of course, reliable data storage and convenient access to it. Therefore, I want to present my vision of one of the key components of the home network - a centralized data warehouse, and it will be based on a mini-PC with the Ubuntu Server OS.
This, to put it mildly, surprised me, because this should not be in an ideal network. But at the same time, to watch a video that he does not support on a DLNA TV, he suggested switching on a laptop with transcoding DLNA. The author suggested using a hardware NAS, because it is supposedly easier to administer, does not require Linux knowledge, and indeed the NAS is quiet. Hello, Habr! During the discussion of one article about the "ideal" home network, a dispute arose, which is better, a hardware NAS or a mini-computer with Linux distribution.